Outsourcing can be a
positive thing when done right. That means building a partnership between your
company and the contractor’s company. Even with a good relationship, however,
it’s still necessary to ensure the contractor performs up to par — and tweaks
its processes for the better regularly instead of sticking with the status quo.
How do companies evaluate their contractors and ensure they take steps to
improve where needed? Should we issue a report card with a formal letter or have
a meeting to discuss strengths and weaknesses?
— Linda, Director
Summary of Best Advice Received
|
e-Newsletters 101 Plus Learn the current trends about e-newsletters and how to find, develop and create meaningful content. Which type of newsletter is best for your company? |
Grading outsourced partners
by Meryl K. Evans, Editor, PSJ
Outsourcing done right saves money. It lets experts handle the outsourced process that isn’t part of the company’s core business. But what happens when the process doesn’t run smoothly? A partner could be a great match at the start of the contract, but as contractors come and go, this relationship could fall apart. How can we hold our outsourced partners accountable? How can we ensure they don’t get lazy? And, on our end, how do we prevent taking them for granted?
One reader says: Grade them! Channel a teacher and hold quarterly evaluations. This reader’s company provides quarterly feedback regarding its outsourced partners’ performance. The feedback includes the following:
|
I Never Get Everything Done Does your “To Do” list seem to grow every day? Are you running at a frantic pace and going nowhere? Does fighting fires delay your main goals? Learn five key steps that help you get more done and eliminate the stress and frustration. |
The reader’s company also gives the contractor the opportunity to provide feedback. The evaluation process is backed by process models like Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute’s Capability Maturity Model (CMM).
One of
CMMI for Development’s [pdf file] components, supplier agreement management
(SAM), includes monitoring and evaluating the supplier’s processes. Typical work
products for monitoring supplies are lists of processes to monitor, activity
reports, performance reports, performance curves and discrepancy reports.
Here’s an
example
form for evaluating a contractor’s performance from the U.S. Department of
Transportation. Government agencies frequently evaluate contractor performance.
A simple Internet search yields examples and policies on many government Web
sites.
|
Submit a question or share your thoughts about a story in the PSJ Blog. |
Keep your contractors on their toes, and regularly issue a report card. Adding a penalty clause is one way to ensure they’re accountable for their actions when they’re not performing up to standards or the requirements outlined in the service level agreement (SLA).
Meryl K. Evans is the content maven behind this newsletter. Stop by her site or check out her blog.
Metaphorically Selling
by Ann Miller
Complete our 1-minute reader survey and you could win a PAIR of Garmin Rino 110 MP3 GPS.
eNewsletters, eSurveys, eSeminars, Blogs and eBooks
developed specifically for your organization